From a5969cabbb4660eab42b6ef0412cbbd1200cf14d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hc <hc@nodka.com> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:10:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 修改led为gpio --- kernel/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst b/kernel/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst index 30187d4..d6d93e9 100644 --- a/kernel/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst +++ b/kernel/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst @@ -21,10 +21,17 @@ As it is with any bug, the more information provided the easier it will be to diagnose and fix. Please review the procedure outlined in -admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst if you are unclear about what +:doc:`reporting-bugs` if you are unclear about what information is helpful. Any exploit code is very helpful and will not be released without consent from the reporter unless it has already been made public. + +Please send plain text emails without attachments where possible. +It is much harder to have a context-quoted discussion about a complex +issue if all the details are hidden away in attachments. Think of it like a +:doc:`regular patch submission <../process/submitting-patches>` +(even if you don't have a patch yet): describe the problem and impact, list +reproduction steps, and follow it with a proposed fix, all in plain text. Disclosure and embargoed information ------------------------------------ @@ -44,7 +51,7 @@ the logistics of QA and large scale rollouts which require release coordination. -Whilst embargoed information may be shared with trusted individuals in +While embargoed information may be shared with trusted individuals in order to develop a fix, such information will not be published alongside the fix or on any other disclosure channel without the permission of the reporter. This includes but is not limited to the original bug report @@ -56,31 +63,28 @@ of the report are treated confidentially even after the embargo has been lifted, in perpetuity. -Coordination ------------- +Coordination with other groups +------------------------------ -Fixes for sensitive bugs, such as those that might lead to privilege -escalations, may need to be coordinated with the private -<linux-distros@vs.openwall.org> mailing list so that distribution vendors -are well prepared to issue a fixed kernel upon public disclosure of the -upstream fix. Distros will need some time to test the proposed patch and -will generally request at least a few days of embargo, and vendor update -publication prefers to happen Tuesday through Thursday. When appropriate, -the security team can assist with this coordination, or the reporter can -include linux-distros from the start. In this case, remember to prefix -the email Subject line with "[vs]" as described in the linux-distros wiki: -<http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros#how-to-use-the-lists> +The kernel security team strongly recommends that reporters of potential +security issues NEVER contact the "linux-distros" mailing list until +AFTER discussing it with the kernel security team. Do not Cc: both +lists at once. You may contact the linux-distros mailing list after a +fix has been agreed on and you fully understand the requirements that +doing so will impose on you and the kernel community. + +The different lists have different goals and the linux-distros rules do +not contribute to actually fixing any potential security problems. CVE assignment -------------- -The security team does not normally assign CVEs, nor do we require them -for reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and -may delay the bug handling. If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier -assigned ahead of public disclosure, they will need to contact the private -linux-distros list, described above. When such a CVE identifier is known -before a patch is provided, it is desirable to mention it in the commit -message if the reporter agrees. +The security team does not assign CVEs, nor do we require them for +reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and may +delay the bug handling. If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier +assigned, they should find one by themselves, for example by contacting +MITRE directly. However under no circumstances will a patch inclusion +be delayed to wait for a CVE identifier to arrive. Non-disclosure agreements ------------------------- -- Gitblit v1.6.2