From 9d77db3c730780c8ef5ccd4b66403ff5675cfe4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hc <hc@nodka.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 10:30:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] modify sin led gpio
---
kernel/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/kernel/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index 18e014f..84de9f9 100644
--- a/kernel/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/kernel/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -1090,8 +1090,11 @@
return 0;
}
-static int fanotify_events_supported(struct path *path, __u64 mask)
+static int fanotify_events_supported(struct path *path, __u64 mask,
+ unsigned int flags)
{
+ unsigned int mark_type = flags & FANOTIFY_MARK_TYPE_BITS;
+
/*
* Some filesystems such as 'proc' acquire unusual locks when opening
* files. For them fanotify permission events have high chances of
@@ -1103,6 +1106,21 @@
if (mask & FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS &&
path->mnt->mnt_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_DISALLOW_NOTIFY_PERM)
return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * mount and sb marks are not allowed on kernel internal pseudo fs,
+ * like pipe_mnt, because that would subscribe to events on all the
+ * anonynous pipes in the system.
+ *
+ * SB_NOUSER covers all of the internal pseudo fs whose objects are not
+ * exposed to user's mount namespace, but there are other SB_KERNMOUNT
+ * fs, like nsfs, debugfs, for which the value of allowing sb and mount
+ * mark is questionable. For now we leave them alone.
+ */
+ if (mark_type != FAN_MARK_INODE &&
+ path->mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & SB_NOUSER)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1218,7 +1236,7 @@
goto fput_and_out;
if (flags & FAN_MARK_ADD) {
- ret = fanotify_events_supported(&path, mask);
+ ret = fanotify_events_supported(&path, mask, flags);
if (ret)
goto path_put_and_out;
}
--
Gitblit v1.6.2