From 8ac6c7a54ed1b98d142dce24b11c6de6a1e239a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hc <hc@nodka.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:36:11 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 修改4g拨号为QMI,需要在系统里后台执行quectel-CM
---
kernel/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h | 59 +++++------------------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h b/kernel/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h
index 92ec486..c56bfff 100644
--- a/kernel/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/kernel/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -2,64 +2,15 @@
#ifndef __BARRIER_H
#define __BARRIER_H
-#include <asm/compiler.h>
-
#define mb() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
#define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("wmb": : :"memory")
-/**
- * read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
- * depend on.
- *
- * No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
- * over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
- * to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
- * reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
- * any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
- * rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
- * rmb().
- *
- * These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
- * and the compiler.
- *
- * Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
- * not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
- * memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
- *
- * For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
- * value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
- *
- * <programlisting>
- * CPU 0 CPU 1
- *
- * b = 2;
- * memory_barrier();
- * p = &b; q = p;
- * read_barrier_depends();
- * d = *q;
- * </programlisting>
- *
- * because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
- * two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
- * the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
- *
- * <programlisting>
- * CPU 0 CPU 1
- *
- * a = 2;
- * memory_barrier();
- * b = 3; y = b;
- * read_barrier_depends();
- * x = a;
- * </programlisting>
- *
- * does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
- * the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
- * as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
- * in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
- */
-#define read_barrier_depends() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
+#define __smp_load_acquire(p) \
+({ \
+ compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
+ __READ_ONCE(*p); \
+})
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define __ASM_SMP_MB "\tmb\n"
--
Gitblit v1.6.2