From 2f7c68cb55ecb7331f2381deb497c27155f32faf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hc <hc@nodka.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:43:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] update kernel to 5.10.198
---
kernel/fs/verity/signature.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fs/verity/signature.c b/kernel/fs/verity/signature.c
index e33f6c4..f823fb3 100644
--- a/kernel/fs/verity/signature.c
+++ b/kernel/fs/verity/signature.c
@@ -81,6 +81,22 @@
return 0;
}
+ if (fsverity_keyring->keys.nr_leaves_on_tree == 0) {
+ /*
+ * The ".fs-verity" keyring is empty, due to builtin signatures
+ * being supported by the kernel but not actually being used.
+ * In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() would always return an
+ * error, usually ENOKEY. It could also be EBADMSG if the
+ * PKCS#7 is malformed, but that isn't very important to
+ * distinguish. So, just skip to ENOKEY to avoid the attack
+ * surface of the PKCS#7 parser, which would otherwise be
+ * reachable by any task able to execute FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY.
+ */
+ fsverity_err(inode,
+ "fs-verity keyring is empty, rejecting signed file!");
+ return -ENOKEY;
+ }
+
d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d) + hash_alg->digest_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!d)
return -ENOMEM;
--
Gitblit v1.6.2