From 1c055e55a242a33e574e48be530e06770a210dcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hc <hc@nodka.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 03:26:26 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] add r8169 read mac form eeprom
---
kernel/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/kernel/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index a389fa8..8bf72a3 100644
--- a/kernel/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/kernel/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
/*
* in-kernel handling for sie intercepts
*
- * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008, 2014
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008, 2020
*
* Author(s): Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
* Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
-#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/sysinfo.h>
+#include <asm/uv.h>
#include "kvm-s390.h"
#include "gaccess.h"
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@
return rc;
}
+ /*
+ * no need to check the return value of vcpu_stop as it can only have
+ * an error for protvirt, but protvirt means user cpu state
+ */
if (!kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(vcpu->kvm))
kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(vcpu);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -231,6 +235,13 @@
vcpu->stat.exit_program_interruption++;
+ /*
+ * Intercept 8 indicates a loop of specification exceptions
+ * for protected guests.
+ */
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (guestdbg_enabled(vcpu) && per_event(vcpu)) {
rc = kvm_s390_handle_per_event(vcpu);
if (rc)
@@ -259,10 +270,18 @@
/**
* handle_external_interrupt - used for external interruption interceptions
*
- * This interception only occurs if the CPUSTAT_EXT_INT bit was set, or if
- * the new PSW does not have external interrupts disabled. In the first case,
- * we've got to deliver the interrupt manually, and in the second case, we
- * drop to userspace to handle the situation there.
+ * This interception occurs if:
+ * - the CPUSTAT_EXT_INT bit was already set when the external interrupt
+ * occurred. In this case, the interrupt needs to be injected manually to
+ * preserve interrupt priority.
+ * - the external new PSW has external interrupts enabled, which will cause an
+ * interruption loop. We drop to userspace in this case.
+ *
+ * The latter case can be detected by inspecting the external mask bit in the
+ * external new psw.
+ *
+ * Under PV, only the latter case can occur, since interrupt priorities are
+ * handled in the ultravisor.
*/
static int handle_external_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
@@ -273,10 +292,18 @@
vcpu->stat.exit_external_interrupt++;
- rc = read_guest_lc(vcpu, __LC_EXT_NEW_PSW, &newpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
- if (rc)
- return rc;
- /* We can not handle clock comparator or timer interrupt with bad PSW */
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)) {
+ newpsw = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw;
+ } else {
+ rc = read_guest_lc(vcpu, __LC_EXT_NEW_PSW, &newpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Clock comparator or timer interrupt with external interrupt enabled
+ * will cause interrupt loop. Drop to userspace.
+ */
if ((eic == EXT_IRQ_CLK_COMP || eic == EXT_IRQ_CPU_TIMER) &&
(newpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_EXT))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -360,8 +387,8 @@
*/
int handle_sthyi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int reg1, reg2, r = 0;
- u64 code, addr, cc = 0, rc = 0;
+ int reg1, reg2, cc = 0, r = 0;
+ u64 code, addr, rc = 0;
struct sthyi_sctns *sctns = NULL;
if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 74))
@@ -384,7 +411,7 @@
goto out;
}
- if (addr & ~PAGE_MASK)
+ if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu) && (addr & ~PAGE_MASK))
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
sctns = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -392,13 +419,21 @@
return -ENOMEM;
cc = sthyi_fill(sctns, &rc);
-
+ if (cc < 0) {
+ free_page((unsigned long)sctns);
+ return cc;
+ }
out:
if (!cc) {
- r = write_guest(vcpu, addr, reg2, sctns, PAGE_SIZE);
- if (r) {
- free_page((unsigned long)sctns);
- return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, r);
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)) {
+ memcpy((void *)(sida_origin(vcpu->arch.sie_block)),
+ sctns, PAGE_SIZE);
+ } else {
+ r = write_guest(vcpu, addr, reg2, sctns, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (r) {
+ free_page((unsigned long)sctns);
+ return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, r);
+ }
}
}
@@ -444,6 +479,92 @@
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
}
+static int handle_pv_spx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ u32 pref = *(u32 *)vcpu->arch.sie_block->sidad;
+
+ kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, pref);
+ trace_kvm_s390_handle_prefix(vcpu, 1, pref);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int handle_pv_sclp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int;
+
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
+ /*
+ * 2 cases:
+ * a: an sccb answering interrupt was already pending or in flight.
+ * As the sccb value is not known we can simply set some value to
+ * trigger delivery of a saved SCCB. UV will then use its saved
+ * copy of the SCCB value.
+ * b: an error SCCB interrupt needs to be injected so we also inject
+ * a fake SCCB address. Firmware will use the proper one.
+ * This makes sure, that both errors and real sccb returns will only
+ * be delivered after a notification intercept (instruction has
+ * finished) but not after others.
+ */
+ fi->srv_signal.ext_params |= 0x43000;
+ set_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs);
+ clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->masked_irqs);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int handle_pv_uvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct uv_cb_share *guest_uvcb = (void *)vcpu->arch.sie_block->sidad;
+ struct uv_cb_cts uvcb = {
+ .header.cmd = UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED,
+ .header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
+ .guest_handle = kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(vcpu->kvm),
+ .gaddr = guest_uvcb->paddr,
+ };
+ int rc;
+
+ if (guest_uvcb->header.cmd != UVC_CMD_REMOVE_SHARED_ACCESS) {
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "Unexpected notification intercept for UVC 0x%x\n",
+ guest_uvcb->header.cmd);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ rc = gmap_make_secure(vcpu->arch.gmap, uvcb.gaddr, &uvcb);
+ /*
+ * If the unpin did not succeed, the guest will exit again for the UVC
+ * and we will retry the unpin.
+ */
+ if (rc == -EINVAL)
+ return 0;
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int handle_pv_notification(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa == 0xb210)
+ return handle_pv_spx(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa == 0xb220)
+ return handle_pv_sclp(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa == 0xb9a4)
+ return handle_pv_uvc(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa >> 8 == 0xae) {
+ /*
+ * Besides external call, other SIGP orders also cause a
+ * 108 (pv notify) intercept. In contrast to external call,
+ * these orders need to be emulated and hence the appropriate
+ * place to handle them is in handle_instruction().
+ * So first try kvm_s390_handle_sigp_pei() and if that isn't
+ * successful, go on with handle_instruction().
+ */
+ ret = kvm_s390_handle_sigp_pei(vcpu);
+ if (!ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return handle_instruction(vcpu);
+}
+
int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int rc, per_rc = 0;
@@ -480,6 +601,28 @@
case ICPT_KSS:
rc = kvm_s390_skey_check_enable(vcpu);
break;
+ case ICPT_MCHKREQ:
+ case ICPT_INT_ENABLE:
+ /*
+ * PSW bit 13 or a CR (0, 6, 14) changed and we might
+ * now be able to deliver interrupts. The pre-run code
+ * will take care of this.
+ */
+ rc = 0;
+ break;
+ case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
+ rc = handle_instruction(vcpu);
+ break;
+ case ICPT_PV_NOTIFY:
+ rc = handle_pv_notification(vcpu);
+ break;
+ case ICPT_PV_PREF:
+ rc = 0;
+ gmap_convert_to_secure(vcpu->arch.gmap,
+ kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu));
+ gmap_convert_to_secure(vcpu->arch.gmap,
+ kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu) + PAGE_SIZE);
+ break;
default:
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
Gitblit v1.6.2