From 102a0743326a03cd1a1202ceda21e175b7d3575c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hc <hc@nodka.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 01:20:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] add new system file
---
kernel/include/linux/sched/task.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/include/linux/sched/task.h b/kernel/include/linux/sched/task.h
index 5629761..99d4557 100644
--- a/kernel/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/kernel/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -61,7 +61,9 @@
extern void sched_dead(struct task_struct *p);
void __noreturn do_task_dead(void);
+void __noreturn make_task_dead(int signr);
+extern void mm_cache_init(void);
extern void proc_caches_init(void);
extern void fork_init(void);
@@ -88,7 +90,6 @@
extern pid_t kernel_clone(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs);
struct task_struct *create_io_thread(int (*fn)(void *), void *arg, int node);
struct task_struct *fork_idle(int);
-struct mm_struct *copy_init_mm(void);
extern pid_t kernel_thread(int (*fn)(void *), void *arg, unsigned long flags);
extern long kernel_wait4(pid_t, int __user *, int, struct rusage *);
int kernel_wait(pid_t pid, int *stat);
@@ -109,10 +110,36 @@
}
extern void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t);
+extern void __put_task_struct_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp);
static inline void put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t)
{
- if (refcount_dec_and_test(&t->usage))
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&t->usage))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * under PREEMPT_RT, we can't call put_task_struct
+ * in atomic context because it will indirectly
+ * acquire sleeping locks.
+ *
+ * call_rcu() will schedule delayed_put_task_struct_rcu()
+ * to be called in process context.
+ *
+ * __put_task_struct() is called when
+ * refcount_dec_and_test(&t->usage) succeeds.
+ *
+ * This means that it can't "conflict" with
+ * put_task_struct_rcu_user() which abuses ->rcu the same
+ * way; rcu_users has a reference so task->usage can't be
+ * zero after rcu_users 1 -> 0 transition.
+ *
+ * delayed_free_task() also uses ->rcu, but it is only called
+ * when it fails to fork a process. Therefore, there is no
+ * way it can conflict with put_task_struct().
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && !preemptible())
+ call_rcu(&t->rcu, __put_task_struct_rcu_cb);
+ else
__put_task_struct(t);
}
--
Gitblit v1.6.2