| .. | .. |
|---|
| 2 | 2 | #ifndef __PARISC_LDCW_H |
|---|
| 3 | 3 | #define __PARISC_LDCW_H |
|---|
| 4 | 4 | |
|---|
| 5 | | -#ifndef CONFIG_PA20 |
|---|
| 6 | 5 | /* Because kmalloc only guarantees 8-byte alignment for kmalloc'd data, |
|---|
| 7 | 6 | and GCC only guarantees 8-byte alignment for stack locals, we can't |
|---|
| 8 | 7 | be assured of 16-byte alignment for atomic lock data even if we |
|---|
| 9 | 8 | specify "__attribute ((aligned(16)))" in the type declaration. So, |
|---|
| 10 | 9 | we use a struct containing an array of four ints for the atomic lock |
|---|
| 11 | 10 | type and dynamically select the 16-byte aligned int from the array |
|---|
| 12 | | - for the semaphore. */ |
|---|
| 11 | + for the semaphore. */ |
|---|
| 12 | + |
|---|
| 13 | +/* From: "Jim Hull" <jim.hull of hp.com> |
|---|
| 14 | + I've attached a summary of the change, but basically, for PA 2.0, as |
|---|
| 15 | + long as the ",CO" (coherent operation) completer is implemented, then the |
|---|
| 16 | + 16-byte alignment requirement for ldcw and ldcd is relaxed, and instead |
|---|
| 17 | + they only require "natural" alignment (4-byte for ldcw, 8-byte for |
|---|
| 18 | + ldcd). |
|---|
| 19 | + |
|---|
| 20 | + Although the cache control hint is accepted by all PA 2.0 processors, |
|---|
| 21 | + it is only implemented on PA8800/PA8900 CPUs. Prior PA8X00 CPUs still |
|---|
| 22 | + require 16-byte alignment. If the address is unaligned, the operation |
|---|
| 23 | + of the instruction is undefined. The ldcw instruction does not generate |
|---|
| 24 | + unaligned data reference traps so misaligned accesses are not detected. |
|---|
| 25 | + This hid the problem for years. So, restore the 16-byte alignment dropped |
|---|
| 26 | + by Kyle McMartin in "Remove __ldcw_align for PA-RISC 2.0 processors". */ |
|---|
| 13 | 27 | |
|---|
| 14 | 28 | #define __PA_LDCW_ALIGNMENT 16 |
|---|
| 15 | 29 | #define __PA_LDCW_ALIGN_ORDER 4 |
|---|
| .. | .. |
|---|
| 19 | 33 | & ~(__PA_LDCW_ALIGNMENT - 1); \ |
|---|
| 20 | 34 | (volatile unsigned int *) __ret; \ |
|---|
| 21 | 35 | }) |
|---|
| 22 | | -#define __LDCW "ldcw" |
|---|
| 23 | 36 | |
|---|
| 24 | | -#else /*CONFIG_PA20*/ |
|---|
| 25 | | -/* From: "Jim Hull" <jim.hull of hp.com> |
|---|
| 26 | | - I've attached a summary of the change, but basically, for PA 2.0, as |
|---|
| 27 | | - long as the ",CO" (coherent operation) completer is specified, then the |
|---|
| 28 | | - 16-byte alignment requirement for ldcw and ldcd is relaxed, and instead |
|---|
| 29 | | - they only require "natural" alignment (4-byte for ldcw, 8-byte for |
|---|
| 30 | | - ldcd). */ |
|---|
| 31 | | - |
|---|
| 32 | | -#define __PA_LDCW_ALIGNMENT 4 |
|---|
| 33 | | -#define __PA_LDCW_ALIGN_ORDER 2 |
|---|
| 34 | | -#define __ldcw_align(a) (&(a)->slock) |
|---|
| 37 | +#ifdef CONFIG_PA20 |
|---|
| 35 | 38 | #define __LDCW "ldcw,co" |
|---|
| 36 | | - |
|---|
| 37 | | -#endif /*!CONFIG_PA20*/ |
|---|
| 39 | +#else |
|---|
| 40 | +#define __LDCW "ldcw" |
|---|
| 41 | +#endif |
|---|
| 38 | 42 | |
|---|
| 39 | 43 | /* LDCW, the only atomic read-write operation PA-RISC has. *sigh*. |
|---|
| 40 | 44 | We don't explicitly expose that "*a" may be written as reload |
|---|
| .. | .. |
|---|
| 52 | 56 | }) |
|---|
| 53 | 57 | |
|---|
| 54 | 58 | #ifdef CONFIG_SMP |
|---|
| 55 | | -# define __lock_aligned __attribute__((__section__(".data..lock_aligned"))) |
|---|
| 59 | +# define __lock_aligned __section(".data..lock_aligned") |
|---|
| 56 | 60 | #endif |
|---|
| 57 | 61 | |
|---|
| 58 | 62 | #endif /* __PARISC_LDCW_H */ |
|---|